Version: 1.5
*START 2
N Originating Program: RUSLE2
N Skel Format Version: 1.1
N This management file was originally converted from the NRCS standard XML format on - Thu Jun 21 11:13:10 PDT 2012
N This management file was updated to contain the most current crop and operation records for WEPS on - Tue Jun 26 15:45:05 PDT 2012
N This management file was updated to contain the most current crop and operation records for WEPS on - Tue Dec 17 19:28:17 CST 2013
#------------
D 17/08/01
O 03 Chisel, twisted shovel
+ 10.289317 65 2.9056773 0.0 2.9056773 1.5645955 2.9056773
T This is a stanard 3 inch twisted point chisel plow.  This is a 12 in sp machine placed staggered on three tool bars. MAS 6-4-09
+
G 01 Tillage
+ 165.10033 0.9 1.0 165.10033 101.600204 203.20041
P 01 Break Crust
P 02 Random Roughness
+ 1 48.260098
P 05 Ridges and Dikes
+ 1 152.4003 304.8006 101.600204 0.0 0.0
P 11 Aggregate Crushing
+ 2.4 -2.0
P 12 Soil Loosening
+ 0.85
P 13 Soil Layer Mixing
+ 0.42
P 31 Kill or Defoliate Growing Crop
+ 2
P 40 End crop Biomass Manipulation
P 24 Flatten Standing Biomass
+ 0 0.85 0.8 0.7 0.6 1.0
P 25 Bury Flat Biomass
+ 1 0.9 0.8 0.75 0.6 0.93
P 26 Resurface Buried Biomass
+ 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.15 0.05
P 34 Change Standing Biomass Fall Rate
+ 7 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0
+ 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0
#------------
D 17/08/01
O 03 Disk, tandem secondary op
+ 4.4898834 32.5 2.2351363 0.0 2.2351363 1.3410819 2.6821637
T 9-in. Spacing, Front and Rear; Good for seedbed preparation/chemical incorporation in medium to heavy soils
T Works well in primary tillage in light to medium soils
T Provides good residue-handling capability.  MAS 10-26-06
+
G 01 Tillage
+ 127.00027 0.75 1.0 127.00026 76.20015 152.4003
P 01 Break Crust
P 02 Random Roughness
+ 1 15.240031
P 05 Ridges and Dikes
+ 1 50.800102 228.60046 0.0 0.0 0.0
P 11 Aggregate Crushing
+ 2.8 0.75
P 12 Soil Loosening
+ 0.85
P 13 Soil Layer Mixing
+ 0.4
P 31 Kill or Defoliate Growing Crop
+ 2
P 40 End crop Biomass Manipulation
P 24 Flatten Standing Biomass
+ 0 0.85 0.7 0.6 0.5 1.0
P 25 Bury Flat Biomass
+ 1 0.73 0.63 0.55 0.4 0.73
P 26 Resurface Buried Biomass
+ 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.05 0.02
P 34 Change Standing Biomass Fall Rate
+ 7 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0
+ 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0
#------------
D 22/08/01
O 03 Disk, tandem secondary op
+ 4.4898834 32.5 2.2351363 0.0 2.2351363 1.3410819 2.6821637
T 9-in. Spacing, Front and Rear; Good for seedbed preparation/chemical incorporation in medium to heavy soils
T Works well in primary tillage in light to medium soils
T Provides good residue-handling capability.  MAS 10-26-06
+
G 01 Tillage
+ 127.00027 0.75 1.0 127.00026 76.20015 152.4003
P 01 Break Crust
P 02 Random Roughness
+ 1 15.240031
P 05 Ridges and Dikes
+ 1 50.800102 228.60046 0.0 0.0 0.0
P 11 Aggregate Crushing
+ 2.8 0.75
P 12 Soil Loosening
+ 0.85
P 13 Soil Layer Mixing
+ 0.4
P 31 Kill or Defoliate Growing Crop
+ 2
P 40 End crop Biomass Manipulation
P 24 Flatten Standing Biomass
+ 0 0.85 0.7 0.6 0.5 1.0
P 25 Bury Flat Biomass
+ 1 0.73 0.63 0.55 0.4 0.73
P 26 Resurface Buried Biomass
+ 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.05 0.02
P 34 Change Standing Biomass Fall Rate
+ 7 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0
+ 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0
#------------
D 27/08/01
O 03 Drill or air seeder single disk openers 7-10 in spac
+ 3.2738733 2.44 2.2351363 0.0 2.2351363 1.5645955 2.9056773
T Drill or Air seeder with single disk no-till openers  JD 750 or similar openers. (No-till air drill)
T Based on Drill, no-till single disk 7-10 spacing. 102403 DTL. RUSLE MAS 10-26-06
T G2 was added into file in front of the flattening (P24), burial (P25), and resurfacing (P26) factors because the area affected is less than 1.0 and
T the RUSLE values were normalized to 1.0.  This change will imulate the correct residue changes based on the method set forth in RUSLE.
T RUSLE's factors have been redused to based on the area affected.
T The stalk fall rate factor (P34) was moved ahead of the new (G2) factor to set the fall rate to the less than 1.0 area affected.  8/7/07 MAS
+
G 01 Tillage
+ 63.500134 0.4 0.15 63.50013 50.800102 101.600204
P 01 Break Crust
P 02 Random Roughness
+ 1 7.6200156
P 05 Ridges and Dikes
+ 1 25.400051 203.20041 0.0 0.0 0.0
P 11 Aggregate Crushing
+ 2.8 0.75
P 12 Soil Loosening
+ 0.4
P 13 Soil Layer Mixing
+ 0.20
P 34 Change Standing Biomass Fall Rate
+ 7 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0
+ 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0
G 02 Biomass Manipulation
+ 1.0
P 24 Flatten Standing Biomass
+ 0 0.6 0.4 0.35 0.15 1.0
P 25 Bury Flat Biomass
+ 1 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.03
P 26 Resurface Buried Biomass
+ 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.01
G 03 Crop Name
+ Wheat, winter, grain S.E.
P 51 Seeding Configuration
+ 1 0.0 0
+ 220.0 8.0 1 40.0 1.0 1.0 0
+ bu/ac
+ 10.9 148.833 5 0.8 0.6 0.8
+ 1.2 0.025 2.0 0.0 25.0 1 270 1800.0
+ -5.0 -15.0 0.005 0.05 0.035 30.0
+ 0.013 0.8013 0.4293 -0.086 -0.018 0.932 0.556 0.0736
+ 0.3293 -0.086 2.87 1.0 20.0 0.05 0 0.3
+ 28.571428 335.0 1.4 0.012 0.1 0.1 0.0 2
+ 0.0133 0.0133 0.0133 0.0133 0.04 0.0050 17.1 5.227942
+ -2.08165 0.548606 1.4111 0.077708535 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
T Wheat, winter grain Southeast ,Drilled in 7 inch rows.  Base location Athens, GA    No dormant period in the winter. 051502  DTL
T
T Standing Fall rate reduced from 0.12 to 0.04 #/(# days) because
T WW-Chem fallow in SW KS showed too much standing residue was falling down.  Larry Wagner recommended we
T reduce fall rate. Dave L, Linda S., and I made runs to get the wt to match the standing stalk wt from Fred Fox stalk residue
T samples WERU Lab.  This rate left 24% of the starting count standing.  This is well within the range of values of two paper.
T Both paper showed about 46% left standing at the 440 day after harvest time.  David Nelson, ARS Akron, CO also confirmed
T that the orginal 8% standing was too low.  He thought that the 24% was much more resonable.  MAS 6-7-11
#------------
D 18/04/02
O 04 Graze, rotational 50 pct removal
+ 9.353924E-8 0.4875
T Rotational Grazing system with 50% of growth removed with each grazing cycle.12-20-01 DTL
T Created 11-27-07 MAS
T
T Restructured processes.  Moved all grazing to O4 for energy and stir cal.
T
T Crop removal (green standing) is cal by using Rusle factors
T Port of Tt biomas affected (%)-(Port of Tt biomas affected (%))x(Portion of affected left on surface (%)
T Graze, continous Example: 0.3-(0.3 x 0.5) = 0.15
T
T Flattening Residue is cal by using Rusle Factors
T Port of Tt biomas affected (%) x Portion of affected left on surface (%)
T Graze, continous Example 0.3 x 0.5 = 0.15
T This value was used for the Mod residue (Wheat) values were reduced by 10% or increased by 10% of the value for each residue class.
T MAS 4-2-08
T Changed stem removal from 0.5 to 0 to prevent the stand from thining.  MAS 1-6-11
T Changed reports to include only the current green crop biomass.  Multiple report values are confusing users.  MAS 6-21-11
+
G 02 Biomass Manipulation
+ 1
P 62 Remove (by age pool) Plant/Residue Material
+ 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
P 62 Remove (by age pool) Plant/Residue Material
+ 0 0 1 0 2 4 2 .05 .05 .05 0.0 0.0
P 62 Remove (by age pool) Plant/Residue Material
+ 0 0 1 0 1 4 2 0.1 .1 0.1 0 0
P 24 Flatten Standing Biomass
+ 1 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.01 0.01
#------------
D 28/06/02
O 04 Graze, rotational 50 pct removal
+ 9.353924E-8 0.4875
T Rotational Grazing system with 50% of growth removed with each grazing cycle.12-20-01 DTL
T Created 11-27-07 MAS
T
T Restructured processes.  Moved all grazing to O4 for energy and stir cal.
T
T Crop removal (green standing) is cal by using Rusle factors
T Port of Tt biomas affected (%)-(Port of Tt biomas affected (%))x(Portion of affected left on surface (%)
T Graze, continous Example: 0.3-(0.3 x 0.5) = 0.15
T
T Flattening Residue is cal by using Rusle Factors
T Port of Tt biomas affected (%) x Portion of affected left on surface (%)
T Graze, continous Example 0.3 x 0.5 = 0.15
T This value was used for the Mod residue (Wheat) values were reduced by 10% or increased by 10% of the value for each residue class.
T MAS 4-2-08
T Changed stem removal from 0.5 to 0 to prevent the stand from thining.  MAS 1-6-11
T Changed reports to include only the current green crop biomass.  Multiple report values are confusing users.  MAS 6-21-11
+
G 02 Biomass Manipulation
+ 1
P 62 Remove (by age pool) Plant/Residue Material
+ 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
P 62 Remove (by age pool) Plant/Residue Material
+ 0 0 1 0 2 4 2 .05 .05 .05 0.0 0.0
P 62 Remove (by age pool) Plant/Residue Material
+ 0 0 1 0 1 4 2 0.1 .1 0.1 0 0
P 24 Flatten Standing Biomass
+ 1 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.01 0.01
#------------
D 16/10/02
O 04 Graze, rotational 50 pct removal
+ 9.353924E-8 0.4875
T Rotational Grazing system with 50% of growth removed with each grazing cycle.12-20-01 DTL
T Created 11-27-07 MAS
T
T Restructured processes.  Moved all grazing to O4 for energy and stir cal.
T
T Crop removal (green standing) is cal by using Rusle factors
T Port of Tt biomas affected (%)-(Port of Tt biomas affected (%))x(Portion of affected left on surface (%)
T Graze, continous Example: 0.3-(0.3 x 0.5) = 0.15
T
T Flattening Residue is cal by using Rusle Factors
T Port of Tt biomas affected (%) x Portion of affected left on surface (%)
T Graze, continous Example 0.3 x 0.5 = 0.15
T This value was used for the Mod residue (Wheat) values were reduced by 10% or increased by 10% of the value for each residue class.
T MAS 4-2-08
T Changed stem removal from 0.5 to 0 to prevent the stand from thining.  MAS 1-6-11
T Changed reports to include only the current green crop biomass.  Multiple report values are confusing users.  MAS 6-21-11
+
G 02 Biomass Manipulation
+ 1
P 62 Remove (by age pool) Plant/Residue Material
+ 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
P 62 Remove (by age pool) Plant/Residue Material
+ 0 0 1 0 2 4 2 .05 .05 .05 0.0 0.0
P 62 Remove (by age pool) Plant/Residue Material
+ 0 0 1 0 1 4 2 0.1 .1 0.1 0 0
P 24 Flatten Standing Biomass
+ 1 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.01 0.01
#------------
*END
*EOF
